Bezirksjugend Unterland
KJEM Unterland Süd 25/26 - U10
Salvatore Ketterer
Schachbezirk Unterland » Bezirksjugend
Seite 2 von 6
<- vorherige Seite | nächste Seite ->
U10 Abschlusstabelle
| Fortschrittstabelle: Stand nach der 7. Runde (nach Rangliste) | ||||||||||||||
| Nr. | Teilnehmer | Tit | TWZ | Verein/Ort | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Punk | Buch | SoBerg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liang,Daqian Da | 939 | SF 59 Kornwest | 9s1 | 4w1 | 2s1 | 7w1 | 3s0 | 6w1 | 5s1 | 6.0 | 29.5 | 24.50 | |
| 2 | Gadamshetty Kis | 847 | SC Asperg | 5w1 | 10s1 | 1w0 | 6s1 | 4w1 | 3w1 | 7s1 | 6.0 | 29.0 | 23.00 | |
| 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | SF Pattonville | 8s1 | 7w½ | 4s½ | 5w1 | 1w1 | 2s0 | 11s1 | 5.0 | 28.5 | 18.50 | |
| 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | SF Pattonville | 6w1 | 1s0 | 3w½ | 9s1 | 2s0 | 12w1 | 8s1 | 4.5 | 26.5 | 12.00 | |
| 5 | Andrianaly,Faly | SF 59 Kornwest | 2s0 | 11w1 | 8s1 | 3s0 | 7w1 | 10s1 | 1w0 | 4.0 | 27.0 | 10.00 | ||
| 6 | Eisenlauer,Marv | SVG Vaihingen/ | 4s0 | 9w1 | 11s1 | 2w0 | 8s1 | 1s0 | 12w1 | 4.0 | 23.5 | 7.00 | ||
| 7 | Berg,Theo | SF Pattonville | 12w1 | 3s½ | 10w1 | 1s0 | 5s0 | 11w1 | 2w0 | 3.5 | 24.5 | 6.00 | ||
| 8 | Caracciolo,Chia | SV Besigheim | 3w0 | 12s1 | 5w0 | 10s1 | 6w0 | 9s1 | 4w0 | 3.0 | 22.0 | 4.50 | ||
| 9 | Götz,Olivia | SV Besigheim | 1w0 | 6s0 | 12w1 | 4w0 | 11s½ | 8w0 | 10s1 | 2.5 | 21.0 | 2.75 | ||
| 10 | Kusmirek,Mason | SC Ingersheim | 11s1 | 2w0 | 7s0 | 8w0 | 12s1 | 5w0 | 9w0 | 2.0 | 20.5 | 1.50 | ||
| 11 | Gagel,Marlene | SV Besigheim | 10w0 | 5s0 | 6w0 | 12s1 | 9w½ | 7s0 | 3w0 | 1.5 | 21.0 | 1.25 | ||
| 12 | Koch,Elise | SF Pattonville | 7s0 | 8w0 | 9s0 | 11w0 | 10w0 | 4s0 | 6s0 | 0.0 | 21.0 | 0.00 | ||
| Paarungsliste der 1. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | Götz,Olivia | () | - | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | () | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 2 | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | () | - | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | () | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 3 | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | () | - | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | () | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 4 | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | () | - | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | () | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 5 | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | () | - | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | () | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 6 | 6 | Berg,Theo | () | - | 12 | Koch,Elise | () | 1 - 0 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 2. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (1) | - | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (1) | 1 - 0 | |||
| 2 | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (1) | - | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (1) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (1) | - | 6 | Berg,Theo | (1) | ½ - ½ | ||||
| 4 | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (0) | - | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (0) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 5 | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (0) | - | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (0) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 6 | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | - | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (0) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 3. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (2) | - | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (2) | 0 - 1 | |||
| 2 | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (1) | - | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (1½) | ½ - ½ | |||
| 3 | 6 | Berg,Theo | (1½) | - | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (1) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 4 | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (1) | - | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (1) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 5 | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (0) | - | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (1) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 6 | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (0) | - | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 4. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (3) | - | 6 | Berg,Theo | (2½) | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 2 | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (2) | - | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (2) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (2) | - | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (2) | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 4 | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (1) | - | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (1½) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 5 | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (1) | - | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (1) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 6 | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | - | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (0) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 5. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (3) | - | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (4) | 1 - 0 | |||
| 2 | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (3) | - | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (2½) | 1 - 0 | |||
| 3 | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (2) | - | 6 | Berg,Theo | (2½) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 4 | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (2) | - | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (2) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 5 | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (1) | - | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (1) | ½ - ½ | |||||
| 6 | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | - | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (1) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 6. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (4) | - | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (4) | 1 - 0 | |||
| 2 | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (4) | - | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (3) | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 3 | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (2) | - | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (3) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| 4 | 6 | Berg,Theo | (2½) | - | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (1½) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 5 | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (2½) | - | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | 1 - 0 | ||||
| 6 | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (1½) | - | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (2) | 0 - 1 | |||||
| Paarungsliste der 7. Runde | |||||||||||||
| Tisch | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | - | TNr | Teilnehmer | TWZ | Punkte | Ergebnis | At | ||
| 1 | 8 | Andrianaly,Faly | (4) | - | 1 | Liang,Daqian Dar | 939 | (5) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 2 | 6 | Berg,Theo | (3½) | - | 2 | Gadamshetty Kish | 847 | (5) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 3 | 11 | Gagel,Marlene | (1½) | - | 3 | Tempel,Darius | 836 | (4) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 4 | 9 | Caracciolo,Chiar | (3) | - | 4 | Henkel,Leonard | 773 | (3½) | 0 - 1 | ||||
| 5 | 10 | Eisenlauer,Marvi | (3) | - | 12 | Koch,Elise | (0) | 1 - 0 | |||||
| 6 | 5 | Kusmirek,Mason | (2) | - | 7 | Götz,Olivia | (1½) | 0 - 1 | |||||
